REVIEW: SEX AND THE CITY 2
When Sex and the City debuted on the small screen in 1998 it broke new ground with its honest, contemporary take on relationships. Carrie Bradshaw and her friends – Charlotte York, Miranda Hobbes and Samantha Jones – soon became iconic pop culture figures; appealing not only to the fairer sex but also a horde of gay fans.
The series featured a refreshingly intimate and sometimes explicit look at urban sexuality with intelligent, cleverly written scripts that set new standards for a television series about women and their lives.
Those days are over.
Somehow, something went wrong with the transition to the big screen. Carrie’s previously charming and genuine insights have been replaced with clichés and blandness and the sharp dialogue is now perfunctory and obvious. Wit has been taken over by crass and silly humour.
Sex and the City 2 is set two years after the last movie and sees Carrie grappling with the mundane domesticity of marriage, Charlotte struggling with the demands of motherhood, Miranda being sidelined at work and Samantha obsessing over staving off the ravages of ageing.
A fully paid for luxury holiday in Abu Dhabi for the whole gang might just be what they need…
The film kicks off with a gay wedding in New York: a camp-fest filled with lisping queens, white swans and even Liza Minnelli, looking like a demented plastic surgery Muppet, bleating out Beyonce’s Single Ladies. It’s both the gayest and most tragic thing I’ve seen in years.
When Carrie’s best gay friend, Stanford Blatch, appeared in the series it was refreshing to see a gay character on television. Times have moved on but, while Stanford finally gets hitched, the show’s depiction of gay people has not. In Sex and the City 2 they are little more than slightly lurid queens who can be easily identified by their pout and ‘gay face’.
Time is also catching up with our girls. While I’m all for women asserting their sexuality as they mature, these characters seem stuck in some kind of silicone time-warp. Watching Samantha Jones at 52 simulating a blowjob with a hookah pipe to seduce a man is honestly disturbing. While once there was strength to Samantha’s self-affirming powerhouse sexuality it’s now desperate and pathetic.
The woman-affirming theme of the film also goes horribly off course when the girls end up performing a cringe-worthy karaoke set of I Am Woman in a nightclub. The film’s attempt to comment on women’s rights in the Middle East also falls terribly flat because ultimately the script doesn’t have the guts to take a real stand on any issue at all.
That’s the bad news.
If, however, you’ve been a long-time fan of Sex and the City – like I am – then you’ll most likely forgive these rather glaring flaws and still have a ball. One of the joys of the franchise has always been the likeability of these women and that continues. The fantastic cast make the best of a weak script and manage to pull off some very obvious humour.
There’s much pleasure to be had catching up with the gang, and for fans who remember the girls’ history and baggage many of the seemingly trite scenarios can have some real emotional weight.
But it’s great pity that the potential drama of these situations is not taken far enough; they have no real consequences. The result is that the characters don’t grow or change – despite marriage, children, ageing… and plenty of botox.
Perhaps Carrie, Charlotte, Miranda and Samantha have earned the right to stop probing and challenging and to instead simply have a good time. Go see Sex and the City 2 with that mindset and you’ll probably be entertained. On the other hand there’s a good argument to be made to simply let the girls retire gracefully and with a modicum of style – before they embarrass us all.
out of
Film review. I would like to comment on the review Luiz DeBarros wrote on SEX AND THE CITY 2.
Luiz is clearly no fan of lighthearted comedy. I do understand that, as a film critic he has to dissect each film to the finest detail. But bearing in mind the history of the show, I do think that you have gone a little overboard Luiz.
First of all… this was truly a laugh-a-minute, with the entire audience roaring with laughter throughout. A far as the “demented plastic surgery Muppet” comment goes, It was quite uncalled for, if you consider that Liza is in that state of health because of a stroke she suffered some years ago. Me being one of her biggest fans, did not see her as this caricature you describe and her scene was probably the highlight of the film.
OK… the gay wedding was a bit OTT, but I really do think that very few of the straight people in the audience even made the camp connection. I do think society has moved on, unlike many gay people that always expect to experience discrimination.
I do not think the aim of the film was to affirm woman. To me it was a group of close, crazy friends that escape their mundane lives in New York by taking a trip together, it just so happens to be to Abu Dhabi. And although womens rights were touched on, as well as other taboo issues – like kissing in public – had these issues been explored further, it would have turned the film into a crusade for human rights, which is definitely not what SEX AND THE CITY is all about.
I definitely enjoyed the film immensely and I think the script was brilliant, as did various other people in the literary field that I have discussed it with.
Kobus Wilmans
Ag kom nou, Kobus!. Let’s not get all prissy about reviews, now shall we?
Two things:
1) Movie reviews – and any other “review” in the popular media, for that matter – are entertainment. Let’s not kid ourselves. It’s really their first and foremost purpose. They’re not there to try and “convince” anyone to do or not to do anything (buy a book, see a movie, visit a zoo). Choice is one’s own prerogative, right? And ALL experiences are subjective, so someone else’s opinion should really not upset you THIS much.
2) And if reviews are entertainment, I think Luiz did a FANTASTIC job. I think his comments are sharp, witty, irreverent and I literally burst out laughing at the Liza-Manelli-plastic-surgery-Muppet comment. (If you put yourself out there, no matter what your sad neurological history, you gotta be prepared to take what’s coming your way, don’t ya? All of it. And that includes all of the actresses among us.)
As for “various other people in the literary field”… Please, are you kidding me with that? Perhaps your first mistake is to think their opinion somehow gives more clout to yours.
Ja, jinne, Kobus.. I totally agree with Mnr. Morn? Malan. Get a life, Kobus. Don’t be so touchy. It’s a movie review, it’s not a critique on your mother.
Really!. Way harsh and remember its Sex in the City and not a David Attenborough documentary! Its a story that is light with some grit!